Skip to main content

ChatGPT: MLSN

Most people still confuse the actual meaning of the MLSN guidelines with things like low nitrogen and super low fertilizer usage. While anyone who reads this blog knows this not to be the case I am still surprised to hear other people's interpretations of what they are? Can a computer decipher the MLSN better than that average Greenkeeper? 


HAHAHAHA

It got the name wrong but it was close. 

It understood that the MLSN is for nutrient levels in soils for turfgrass. Awesome.

It got the names of the people who developed the guidelines completely wrong. Dr. Nick Christians is a real person but I'm not sure if John Cushman is. For the Record they were developed by Dr Wendy Gelernter, Dr. Larry Stowell and Dr Micah Woods. 

It got it wrong saying that the MLSN includes recommendations for nitrogen (like everyone else) and micronutrients.

The last sentence could be considered true.

I asked the AI who uses the MLSN guidelines?


Not too bad.

I'm not surprised that the AI got this wrong but I'm also impressed that it got as much right as it did. after 10 years I'm still surprised that so many people still don't have any idea of what the MLSN guideline are especially when they are such a great tool for simplifying fertilizer use for turfgrass. My post yesterday explains the simplicity of it so go check it out.

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Turfgrass speedo is still my most important tool for managing turf growth after 4 years.

It wasn't the easiest year for growing grass , but the conditions were still pretty good. Almost 4 years ago exactly, I came up with the idea of comparing actual clipping yields to the "ideal" clipping yield or the clipping yield adjusted using the Growth Potential Model . Since then, it has proved to be a much more useful tool to manage growth than I originally thought .  It has been almost a decade since I started making observations on plant health and playability and how it relates to the clipping yield. I have been constantly searching for ways to get the growth rate right as often as I can and this tool seems to be the best way I have seen so far, and might ultimately, be the best way going forward. To prove this point I will discuss in a future post, the success I've had with pest control in the past few years (for the most part (Not withstanding the times where I think my greens are dead but they actually aren't...thanks T)). Never needed less There are
Read more

Do you have enough?

I recently discussed how we can use fertilizer ratios to simplify how much fertilizer we apply to help us keep above the MLSN guidelines . When we get a soil test done it is a static amount of nutrients found in the soil. Even if you are above the MLSN guidelines at the time of testing, it doesn't guarantee that you will remain at or above the guidelines as the grass grows and consumes nutrients. There is math that you can use to determine exactly how much nutrient you need to apply to ensure that you remain at or above the MLSN guidelines. For many, this is much too complicated. For that reason I made a quick cheat sheet to help you determine how much of each nutrient you can expect to use each year based off a few different annual nitrogen rates. Nutrient use is based primarily on nitrogen use so the left 2 columns are a few different nitrogen rates. The columns for each nutrient are in PPM and are designed to help you look at your current soil test PPM (mehlich 3) and determin
Read more

How to quantify nutrient content in liquid fertilizer

In a recent post, I discussed how it was actually cheaper to spray soluble vs granular fertilizer. What about if we use pre-mixed liquid fertilizer? How do we even figure out how much nutrient we are applying with pre-mixed liquid fertilizer?  Before I learned that you could simply dissolve soluble fertilizer in water and apply it in a sprayer, I was a big user of pre-mixed liquid fertilizers. One of the issues I initially had was figuring out exactly how much of each nutrient I was applying. The math wasn't as straightforward is it was with granular fertilizers. It turns out, it's actually not that difficult but requires an extra step.  First, we need to convert the liquid volume into a mass. Many products will have the product density displayed on the label or you can look in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for that information as well. No SDS? Should you be using products without an SDS? Even if this information isn't included on the label it is very easy to figure out. All
Read more