Skip to main content

What shape is your grass?

Turfgrass management is a constant battle. Grass vs disease, grass vs weeds, and even grass vs grass. Sometimes it's obvious who is winning the battle but sometimes the victorious organism is less obvious.

This week while looking over some old pictures of the moss disease on my practice green (the moss is all gone by the way) I noticed something that I think could be useful for turf managers to quickly gauge which plant is winning and which is losing. Take a look at the following pic of poa taking over silvery thread moss with the help of some sort of fungi.

It looks very similar to the next picture with is Microdochium nivale totally destroying my approaches a few years back.





And this picture of cyanobacteria thinning poa on my greens.



In all these cases the organism that is winning the battle has a round shape. In the first picture the grass is winning, and in the next two the grass is losing and the fungi/bacteria/algae are winning. Obviously if the conditions are favorable for disease development the disease appears round. This is especially true for patch disease which grow in size.

So great, disease is round. Whoopdy doo.

Where this observation becomes useful is when you are managing one grass species over another or when you want to know if the grass, or a patch of clover is winning the fight. Instead of waiting years to find out we can use the shape of the plant growing on the ground to tell us who is winning. This way we can either keep our management practices the same, or make changes to see if we can alter the conditions to favor the desirable species more.

Another way of looking at it is to look at the border between the two competing organisms. The convex border is winning and the concave is losing.

Take the never-ending battle of poa vs bentgrass. It's really hard to tell just by looking at a turf stand which species is winning the battle. If you look at the shape of the grass on the green you can easily tell which plant is spreading and which plant is being grown over.

The following picture is of my 8th green which is a mixed stand of poa and bent. As you can see the darker bentgrass is in round shaped patches and the poa is not in any clearly defined shape.

Here's a pic of my 4th green from 2011 with small patches of bentgrass just starting to take hold. They are round too. This was taken when I first noticed bentgrass making a comeback on my greens and was one of my first blog posts ever. This was what inspired me to start overseeding bent into my greens. If the bentgrass was doing good I wanted it to be everywhere in case my poa really started to die.



Here is bentgrass taking over on my 5th green. Notice the shape of the edges of the bentgrass patches. A quick glance shows that the bentgrass is clearly winning this fight. And they said you couldn't grow bentgrass on the Coast....


So this is probably no news to you. Way to state the obvious Jason! But I had never thought of this simple and probably very obvious observation in this way and I think that it will really help me easily and quickly evaluate my practices in the future when it comes seeing which organism is winning the battle.

Popular posts from this blog

Turfgrass speedo is still my most important tool for managing turf growth after 4 years.

It wasn't the easiest year for growing grass , but the conditions were still pretty good. Almost 4 years ago exactly, I came up with the idea of comparing actual clipping yields to the "ideal" clipping yield or the clipping yield adjusted using the Growth Potential Model . Since then, it has proved to be a much more useful tool to manage growth than I originally thought .  It has been almost a decade since I started making observations on plant health and playability and how it relates to the clipping yield. I have been constantly searching for ways to get the growth rate right as often as I can and this tool seems to be the best way I have seen so far, and might ultimately, be the best way going forward. To prove this point I will discuss in a future post, the success I've had with pest control in the past few years (for the most part (Not withstanding the times where I think my greens are dead but they actually aren't...thanks T)). Never needed less There are

Do you have enough?

I recently discussed how we can use fertilizer ratios to simplify how much fertilizer we apply to help us keep above the MLSN guidelines . When we get a soil test done it is a static amount of nutrients found in the soil. Even if you are above the MLSN guidelines at the time of testing, it doesn't guarantee that you will remain at or above the guidelines as the grass grows and consumes nutrients. There is math that you can use to determine exactly how much nutrient you need to apply to ensure that you remain at or above the MLSN guidelines. For many, this is much too complicated. For that reason I made a quick cheat sheet to help you determine how much of each nutrient you can expect to use each year based off a few different annual nitrogen rates. Nutrient use is based primarily on nitrogen use so the left 2 columns are a few different nitrogen rates. The columns for each nutrient are in PPM and are designed to help you look at your current soil test PPM (mehlich 3) and determin

How to quantify nutrient content in liquid fertilizer

In a recent post, I discussed how it was actually cheaper to spray soluble vs granular fertilizer. What about if we use pre-mixed liquid fertilizer? How do we even figure out how much nutrient we are applying with pre-mixed liquid fertilizer?  Before I learned that you could simply dissolve soluble fertilizer in water and apply it in a sprayer, I was a big user of pre-mixed liquid fertilizers. One of the issues I initially had was figuring out exactly how much of each nutrient I was applying. The math wasn't as straightforward is it was with granular fertilizers. It turns out, it's actually not that difficult but requires an extra step.  First, we need to convert the liquid volume into a mass. Many products will have the product density displayed on the label or you can look in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for that information as well. No SDS? Should you be using products without an SDS? Even if this information isn't included on the label it is very easy to figure out. All