Skip to main content

Moss Disease Revisited

This week on twitter I saw an interesting tweet.

This triggered my memory of the moss disease I had on my greens a few years ago. I wrote about that in a post in 2013. The reason I hadn't thought much about this interesting moss disease was that for the most part the moss on my greens is gone.

What did I spray?

Well in 2012 I sprayed Kocide 2000. It worked but was pretty harsh on my turf and the moss quickly came back.

In 2014 I sprayed quicksilver but left my upper practice green unsprayed to see what would happen with the serious moss disease infestation. Also, this spray wasn't successful with most of the moss coming back shortly after my 3 successive applications.

In 2013 my upper practice green looked like this.

Today it looks like this and I have not sprayed anything on it between the pics in 2013 and today to try and kill the moss.


There is literally no moss on this green whatsoever.

So if I didn't spray anything, what happened?

The moss was diseased. Yes, even moss gets disease. You can see the brown moss in between the moss/grass interface.


It's almost like the grass is growing in as fast as whatever is killing the moss is spreading.
Traffic

I've learned a lot about moss over the years. I have a hunch it is less tolerant to traffic than grass is and might not tolerate frequent mowing. I also use pin locations to target moss infestations with golfer traffic. This might be one positive side of those troublesome Adizero golf shoes! So I'm thinking, no, the moss is on the ridges on your greens not because it's dry, it's because you don't put any pin locations on the slopes so very little golfer traffic is focused on these parts of your greens. This year we've also rolled our greens 115 times and it's mid June...?

Triplex tire marks have less moss. Does traffic impact moss? It takes an extreme case to visualize.
Fertilizer

Since the old days when moss was an almost constant problem on my greens I have completely changed the way I fertilize my greens. Where I used to withhold nitrogen in August (when moss seems to really take over at my location) I now apply the majority of my nitrogen fertilizer in the Summer. This is based off the growth potential model and has been universally positive for my operation. Not only that, but it has also allowed me to cut my annual fertilizer rates in half and still see improvements in turfgrass quality.

Change of mindset

Since 2014 I have basically ignored moss everywhere on my course. My limited success with Quicksilver and relative reluctance to use a herbicide on my greens left me without much in the way of chemical controls. I also changed the way I thought about weeds and started focusing on the desirable species instead of the pest. So far this has worked out great! It's not just a pipedream haha. Basically I've really focused on grass plant health and it has paid off. Forget the moss, grow good grass!

Less Fungicide

If the pathogen that was killing the moss was a fungi, then it is probably controlled by some of the broad spectrum fungicides we use on turf to control turf fungal pests. Over the years I've made some progress to reduce the fungicide use on my course. For some reasons (I have no clue why) the upper putting green requires almost no fungicide. Maybe this is why the moss disease was allowed to go crazy on the moss?

So there you have it. I kind of hate how hippy dippy this all seems. "Change the way your fertilize, use less fungicide, roll more maaaan, let nature do the work." It really does sound a bit idealistic for my liking but what can I say?



Popular posts from this blog

Turfgrass speedo is still my most important tool for managing turf growth after 4 years.

It wasn't the easiest year for growing grass , but the conditions were still pretty good. Almost 4 years ago exactly, I came up with the idea of comparing actual clipping yields to the "ideal" clipping yield or the clipping yield adjusted using the Growth Potential Model . Since then, it has proved to be a much more useful tool to manage growth than I originally thought .  It has been almost a decade since I started making observations on plant health and playability and how it relates to the clipping yield. I have been constantly searching for ways to get the growth rate right as often as I can and this tool seems to be the best way I have seen so far, and might ultimately, be the best way going forward. To prove this point I will discuss in a future post, the success I've had with pest control in the past few years (for the most part (Not withstanding the times where I think my greens are dead but they actually aren't...thanks T)). Never needed less There are

Do you have enough?

I recently discussed how we can use fertilizer ratios to simplify how much fertilizer we apply to help us keep above the MLSN guidelines . When we get a soil test done it is a static amount of nutrients found in the soil. Even if you are above the MLSN guidelines at the time of testing, it doesn't guarantee that you will remain at or above the guidelines as the grass grows and consumes nutrients. There is math that you can use to determine exactly how much nutrient you need to apply to ensure that you remain at or above the MLSN guidelines. For many, this is much too complicated. For that reason I made a quick cheat sheet to help you determine how much of each nutrient you can expect to use each year based off a few different annual nitrogen rates. Nutrient use is based primarily on nitrogen use so the left 2 columns are a few different nitrogen rates. The columns for each nutrient are in PPM and are designed to help you look at your current soil test PPM (mehlich 3) and determin

How to quantify nutrient content in liquid fertilizer

In a recent post, I discussed how it was actually cheaper to spray soluble vs granular fertilizer. What about if we use pre-mixed liquid fertilizer? How do we even figure out how much nutrient we are applying with pre-mixed liquid fertilizer?  Before I learned that you could simply dissolve soluble fertilizer in water and apply it in a sprayer, I was a big user of pre-mixed liquid fertilizers. One of the issues I initially had was figuring out exactly how much of each nutrient I was applying. The math wasn't as straightforward is it was with granular fertilizers. It turns out, it's actually not that difficult but requires an extra step.  First, we need to convert the liquid volume into a mass. Many products will have the product density displayed on the label or you can look in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for that information as well. No SDS? Should you be using products without an SDS? Even if this information isn't included on the label it is very easy to figure out. All