Skip to main content

Controlling Growth Rates

I've been measuring clipping yield on my greens for the past 5 years. The reasoning for this is to get a good idea of how fast our grass is growing. After all, this is one of the most important things to know as a greenkeeper as described in Micah Wood's book "A Short Grammar of Greenkeeping" which I highly recommend you buy. In it he defines greenkeeping as "managing the growth rate of the grass to create the desired playing surface for golf. All of the work done to the turf is centered around managing how fast the grass will grow. This is consistent across all parts of China. And the best golf course conditions will be created when the superintendent is able to create just the right growth rate."
How fast is your grass growing?
The more I learn about our profession the more I agree with this statement. When I was a young superintendent the growth rates of my turf were all over the place. We were hit with huge growth flushes without notice and were left chasing our tails trying to get everything mowed in time. We had huge issues with grass clippings, thatch, and other turfgrass growth related issues (hint; it's all related to growth). In the past few years as I have learned to manage the growth rates of my grass better by using the growth potential formula to schedule fertilizer rates we have had far less surprises when it comes to growth rates of our grass. We have also had less surprises when it comes to disease, green speed issues, water management and pretty much every other aspect of our golf course management operation.

With growth potential we aren't fertilizing the course based on the date on the calendar. We are basing it on actual conditions. This takes a lot of the guesswork out of fertilizing grass and allows you to accurately predict how the grass grows. If you want it slow, you grow it slow (like I'm doing). If you want it fast you can grow it consistently fast as well. It all depends on your needs,
Slow growth rate = fast, consistent greens
This week while looking over my growth rate records I noticed that this year we have been able to keep our growth rates low and more importantly consistent despite the weather being abnormally warm for this time of year.

As you can see below, we were cutting a frequency of every 3 or 4 days starting right at the beginning of February. This time (mid April) last year we were cutting daily to keep up with the growth rate explosion.

This year, despite the extremely wet and warm conditions, we have been able to only cut every 4 days starting in late March. This was following a period of 107 days where we didn't mow the greens at all. When we finally did mow the greens on Feb 27 we got almost no grass! The growth rate has also been very consistent this winter.


We are now in mid April just before the time when we historically get a big growth flush. I'm not sure whether or not we will get it this year though because we have had weather similar to mid July for the past few weeks and still, growth remains minimal.

So what am I doing different this year than in previous years?
  1. Diligent growth regulator use through the winter. I did not allow the turf to come out of regulation at all this winter. We also did not let off the applications for our "aeration" which consisted of only a medium topdressing as we had aerator issues and I was already questioning the need to aerate in the spring with the low growth rates we have been having.
  2. We aren't pushing growth. In previous years we have had issues with disease on our course but for some reason I'm not 100% sure why we have had almost no disease pressure this year. 
  3. In 2016 we have only applied 0.96 g of nitrogen per square meter (0.2#N/1000sq ft) until the end of April. In 2015 we applied double that. It wasn't until last May that I decided to see what would happen if I cut the amount of N I applied to my greens in half. So far I consider this decision a success but time will tell. The greens don't look like they normally do but they play great and have only required 3 fungicide applications since the beginning of October! I am watching the greens closely for signs of wear but so far we haven't had any issues even though we have been rolling daily (or twice daily) for the past month.
Those of you who have an extra keen sense of observation might notice that in the past we used "basket empties" to measure the amount of clippings collected where this year we use liters. This was at the recommendation from Micah Woods because liters is a more accurate way to measure clippings that relies less on someone's perception on what constitutes a full basket of clippings. Objective vs subjective.

Measuring clippings doesn't have to be a big chore but and there are a few things you can do to make it easy and the most useful to your operation.

We only collect clippings from the middle mower on our triplex on 2 of our 12 greens. This is because it doesn't really matter what the total amount of grass collected is, we just want to have something to compare day to day. One of our greens is too small to gather enough grass for a good measurement so we use 2 greens. We only collect from the middle mower because we sometimes do a circle cut which would augment the clipping yields on those days. By using the middle basket we reduce the impact of this slightly.

We just hang the measuring pail on the mower. Operators make sure the baskets are empty before we cut our 4th and 7th greens (they are close together) then empty the contents of the middle basket into our measuring pail when they are done mowing those 2 greens. After they finish mowing they put this number into the equipment use form and this is automatically fed to my growth rate spreadsheet as seen in the above images.


Measuring the growth rate of my grass has been one of the most enlightening things I have done over the years. We often overlook the importance of collecting good data about what is actually happening on the course. We can get a good idea by just looking at the grass but without measuring and recording this data we make it difficult to learn anything from it in the future. As Micah outlined the importance of controlling growth rates I could talk forever about the benefits of this. Less wear and tear on machinery, less traffic stress from mowing, less thatch, less grinding reels, less labor, less fuel burned...the list is almost endless.

Popular posts from this blog

Turfgrass speedo is still my most important tool for managing turf growth after 4 years.

It wasn't the easiest year for growing grass , but the conditions were still pretty good. Almost 4 years ago exactly, I came up with the idea of comparing actual clipping yields to the "ideal" clipping yield or the clipping yield adjusted using the Growth Potential Model . Since then, it has proved to be a much more useful tool to manage growth than I originally thought .  It has been almost a decade since I started making observations on plant health and playability and how it relates to the clipping yield. I have been constantly searching for ways to get the growth rate right as often as I can and this tool seems to be the best way I have seen so far, and might ultimately, be the best way going forward. To prove this point I will discuss in a future post, the success I've had with pest control in the past few years (for the most part (Not withstanding the times where I think my greens are dead but they actually aren't...thanks T)). Never needed less There are

Do you have enough?

I recently discussed how we can use fertilizer ratios to simplify how much fertilizer we apply to help us keep above the MLSN guidelines . When we get a soil test done it is a static amount of nutrients found in the soil. Even if you are above the MLSN guidelines at the time of testing, it doesn't guarantee that you will remain at or above the guidelines as the grass grows and consumes nutrients. There is math that you can use to determine exactly how much nutrient you need to apply to ensure that you remain at or above the MLSN guidelines. For many, this is much too complicated. For that reason I made a quick cheat sheet to help you determine how much of each nutrient you can expect to use each year based off a few different annual nitrogen rates. Nutrient use is based primarily on nitrogen use so the left 2 columns are a few different nitrogen rates. The columns for each nutrient are in PPM and are designed to help you look at your current soil test PPM (mehlich 3) and determin

How to quantify nutrient content in liquid fertilizer

In a recent post, I discussed how it was actually cheaper to spray soluble vs granular fertilizer. What about if we use pre-mixed liquid fertilizer? How do we even figure out how much nutrient we are applying with pre-mixed liquid fertilizer?  Before I learned that you could simply dissolve soluble fertilizer in water and apply it in a sprayer, I was a big user of pre-mixed liquid fertilizers. One of the issues I initially had was figuring out exactly how much of each nutrient I was applying. The math wasn't as straightforward is it was with granular fertilizers. It turns out, it's actually not that difficult but requires an extra step.  First, we need to convert the liquid volume into a mass. Many products will have the product density displayed on the label or you can look in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for that information as well. No SDS? Should you be using products without an SDS? Even if this information isn't included on the label it is very easy to figure out. All