Skip to main content

Turfgrass fertilization is not that complicated.

I recent did a talk for the Western Washington GCSA about my experience using the MLSN (minimum level of sustainable nutrition) guidelines. I will be making a post about this soon. Today one of the attendees and speakers shared the following link about skipping granular fertilizer.

Kevin was right to assume that I would enjoy this article. I enjoyed it for probably the wrong reasons though, I find it baffling that there is still so much confusion when it comes to fertilizing grass on sand rootzones. I also find it interesting that they only talked with people who work for fertilizer companies and who's best interests are to sell more fertilizer. It's too bad they didn't include any independent turfgrass scientists in the discussion.

The main focus of my recent MLSN discussion was how simple the MLSN guidelines are and how they have helped me simplify my fertilizer use on my golf course. I talked for an hour about how I haven't applied much fertilizer but Micah Woods sums it up in one sentence.

"If your soil tests are above the MLSN guidelines, you can be confident that the grass is supplied with all of that element that it can use."
Of course it's not entirely that simple. A soil test gives you a snapshot of what is in the soil at that time. The grass will use the nutrients as it grows. Micah Woods describes it, "That's why I like to express the quantity of fertilizer to apply as a function of those three amounts: (a) the amount the grass will use, (b) the MLSN guideline, and (c) the soil test. Then a + b - c gives the amount of the nutrient to apply as fertilizer." Even then, it's way more simple than many will have you believe.

My talk discussed how there is a lot of fear when it comes to under-fertilizing but we are lucky in that we have the ability to take soil tests so that this doesn't happen. With a test we can confidently make decisions on what nutrient needs to be applied as fertilizer.

Here is my 2015 soil test results.

 Which I used to base my fertilizer applications on how much nitrogen I expected to apply.
As you can see there are a lot of zeros! Last year I only applied nitrogen and potassium as fertilizer on my greens and tees. On my fairways I have only applied nitrogen for the past 3 years but they are on native soil!

I was one of the first people to use the MLSN guidelines which I explained in my recent talk and will share in an upcoming post. Since then the experience has been 100% positive. If anything, applying hardly any fertilizer has made my golf course better and certainly hasn't made anything worse. We are always concerned about the consequences of under-fertilizing but I wonder what the consequences of over fertilizing are having?
kfusarium.png
Makes you think about the impacts of over-fertilization

I also haven't applied a granular fertilizer to my greens in over 3 years. I apply my fertilizer with my sprayer in very small quantities in a relatively high volume of water (2.5gal/1000 or 1000L/ha). I don't think that granular fertilizers are required and if anything they can result in you applying nutrients that aren't needed in your soil leading to waste because you can't change the nutrient ratio in a blended granular fertilizer.

The only time I've used my granular spreader in past 3 years.
The MLSN guidelines make it very easy to apply the right amount of fertilizer. Not too much, not too little. It's not complicated or risky. In the end it's all about results. You tell me if my lack of fertilizer use has made a negative impact on my golf course.



Popular posts from this blog

Turfgrass speedo is still my most important tool for managing turf growth after 4 years.

It wasn't the easiest year for growing grass , but the conditions were still pretty good. Almost 4 years ago exactly, I came up with the idea of comparing actual clipping yields to the "ideal" clipping yield or the clipping yield adjusted using the Growth Potential Model . Since then, it has proved to be a much more useful tool to manage growth than I originally thought .  It has been almost a decade since I started making observations on plant health and playability and how it relates to the clipping yield. I have been constantly searching for ways to get the growth rate right as often as I can and this tool seems to be the best way I have seen so far, and might ultimately, be the best way going forward. To prove this point I will discuss in a future post, the success I've had with pest control in the past few years (for the most part (Not withstanding the times where I think my greens are dead but they actually aren't...thanks T)). Never needed less There are

Do you have enough?

I recently discussed how we can use fertilizer ratios to simplify how much fertilizer we apply to help us keep above the MLSN guidelines . When we get a soil test done it is a static amount of nutrients found in the soil. Even if you are above the MLSN guidelines at the time of testing, it doesn't guarantee that you will remain at or above the guidelines as the grass grows and consumes nutrients. There is math that you can use to determine exactly how much nutrient you need to apply to ensure that you remain at or above the MLSN guidelines. For many, this is much too complicated. For that reason I made a quick cheat sheet to help you determine how much of each nutrient you can expect to use each year based off a few different annual nitrogen rates. Nutrient use is based primarily on nitrogen use so the left 2 columns are a few different nitrogen rates. The columns for each nutrient are in PPM and are designed to help you look at your current soil test PPM (mehlich 3) and determin

How to quantify nutrient content in liquid fertilizer

In a recent post, I discussed how it was actually cheaper to spray soluble vs granular fertilizer. What about if we use pre-mixed liquid fertilizer? How do we even figure out how much nutrient we are applying with pre-mixed liquid fertilizer?  Before I learned that you could simply dissolve soluble fertilizer in water and apply it in a sprayer, I was a big user of pre-mixed liquid fertilizers. One of the issues I initially had was figuring out exactly how much of each nutrient I was applying. The math wasn't as straightforward is it was with granular fertilizers. It turns out, it's actually not that difficult but requires an extra step.  First, we need to convert the liquid volume into a mass. Many products will have the product density displayed on the label or you can look in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for that information as well. No SDS? Should you be using products without an SDS? Even if this information isn't included on the label it is very easy to figure out. All