Skip to main content

Global Soil Survey Take 3!

I just got my soil tests last week for the Global Soil Survey! Getting soil test results back is just about as good as Christmas! This is the third time that I have taken part in the GSS. Since my first GSS in 2013 I have followed the guidelines religiously saving a ton of money and seeing no real difference in turfgrass quality. Arguably my greens could actually be in better shape now than before I started using the MLSN guidelines.

Here are the results of my GSS in 2013
ppm
In 2014

ppm
And 2015

ppm
The GSS requires that you take samples from areas of good performing turfgrass. Each year I have varied the exact locations for my samples. The reason for this is to compare areas of good turf performance but on different microclimates or turf species etc to see if there is some relationship to what I am seeing to nutrient levels in the soil. From what I can the soil nutrient levels have little to do with what I have observed.

They then tell you how your test results are compared to the MLSN guidelines.

ppm

As you can see all my nutrient levels are in excess of the MLSN guidelines except for Potassium on by 6,8,9th green. I combined the samples of these greens as they were the greens with the most bentgrass. My first green has 0% bentgrass for some reason despite receiving the same amount of seed and having a similar microclimate.

The important thing to remember here is that even though I have a deficiency according the MLSN my 6,8, and 9th greens are not dead. They are, in fact, my best performing greens. The MLSN has a built in safety margin to ensure that you do not go too low!
The greens have never been better or healthier in my opinion
The creators of the MLSN (PACE Turf and Micah Woods) emphasize that the MLSN are not targets to work towards, just nutrient levels you should stay above. I'm a bit insane so I like to use them as targets, I want to see what happens when any nutrient excesses are removed from the soils on my course. It's a work in progress and I do this at my own risk.

After all this they give you the fertilizer requirements based on how much nitrogen you plan to apply each season to ensure that you remain above the MLSN guidelines. This makes your fertilizer program planning very easy. So easy, in fact, that I will walk you through just how simple it will be for me this year.

Look at all that fertilizer I don't have to apply! Going on year 3 of nothing but N and K (s and fe too)

Just because my fertilizer is cheap, doesn't mean that my greens suffer from poor quality.
As you can see the only fertilizer I need to stay above the MLSN guidelines is potassium. Just to play it safe I will use the high rate required based on 4 lbs of N /1000 ss ft per year. 1.7 lbs of potassium on 40,000 sq ft is 68 lbs of potassium or 136 lbs of potassium sulfate. I pay about $30 for a 50lb bag of potassium sulfate so my K costs for the year will be about $81. 4lbs of N/1000 sq ft at $19/ bag of urea will costs me $132. That's a total cost for fertilizer on my greens at $213. There is no mystery here, no special products required to "go low". Just simple fertilizers , the GSS, MLSN, and my sprayer.

There it's that simple. For the past 3 years the cost of the GSS ($250) has been more than the fertilizer that I apply to my greens. Here is to my 3rd season using the GSS and to hopefully a lot more!



Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Turfgrass speedo is still my most important tool for managing turf growth after 4 years.

It wasn't the easiest year for growing grass , but the conditions were still pretty good. Almost 4 years ago exactly, I came up with the idea of comparing actual clipping yields to the "ideal" clipping yield or the clipping yield adjusted using the Growth Potential Model . Since then, it has proved to be a much more useful tool to manage growth than I originally thought .  It has been almost a decade since I started making observations on plant health and playability and how it relates to the clipping yield. I have been constantly searching for ways to get the growth rate right as often as I can and this tool seems to be the best way I have seen so far, and might ultimately, be the best way going forward. To prove this point I will discuss in a future post, the success I've had with pest control in the past few years (for the most part (Not withstanding the times where I think my greens are dead but they actually aren't...thanks T)). Never needed less There are
Read more

Do you have enough?

I recently discussed how we can use fertilizer ratios to simplify how much fertilizer we apply to help us keep above the MLSN guidelines . When we get a soil test done it is a static amount of nutrients found in the soil. Even if you are above the MLSN guidelines at the time of testing, it doesn't guarantee that you will remain at or above the guidelines as the grass grows and consumes nutrients. There is math that you can use to determine exactly how much nutrient you need to apply to ensure that you remain at or above the MLSN guidelines. For many, this is much too complicated. For that reason I made a quick cheat sheet to help you determine how much of each nutrient you can expect to use each year based off a few different annual nitrogen rates. Nutrient use is based primarily on nitrogen use so the left 2 columns are a few different nitrogen rates. The columns for each nutrient are in PPM and are designed to help you look at your current soil test PPM (mehlich 3) and determin
Read more

How to quantify nutrient content in liquid fertilizer

In a recent post, I discussed how it was actually cheaper to spray soluble vs granular fertilizer. What about if we use pre-mixed liquid fertilizer? How do we even figure out how much nutrient we are applying with pre-mixed liquid fertilizer?  Before I learned that you could simply dissolve soluble fertilizer in water and apply it in a sprayer, I was a big user of pre-mixed liquid fertilizers. One of the issues I initially had was figuring out exactly how much of each nutrient I was applying. The math wasn't as straightforward is it was with granular fertilizers. It turns out, it's actually not that difficult but requires an extra step.  First, we need to convert the liquid volume into a mass. Many products will have the product density displayed on the label or you can look in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for that information as well. No SDS? Should you be using products without an SDS? Even if this information isn't included on the label it is very easy to figure out. All
Read more