My new approach to approaches is working.....so far

Clear pattern of disease on approaches Jan 5 2015

My approaches have always been hammered by fusarium during the cool, wet winter months. Last year I hypothesized that most of the damage caused by fusarium was a result of the mowers spreading the disease around and that we might be able to reduce this damage by using Primo in the winter. This winter I decided to try out iron and primo to try and reduce the severity of the fusarium on my approaches. As you can see from the above picture taken on Jan 5 2015, the plan appears to be workin. No other products have been applied to the approaches and traditional pesticides are never applied to the approaches except for minimal overlap from the greens applications.

Recent research has shown that at putting green height a rate of 97.65kg iron sulfate/ ha every 2 weeks provided almost complete control of fusarium during the winter. Because my approaches are cut at a much higher HOC I halved this rate for my approaches and have stretched the interval to 2 months. So far I have only made one application at 50kg iron sulfate/ha on Nov, 7, 2014. I plan to make another application this week if the ground thaws enough to get my sprayer out. Perhaps a monthly interval would work best in the future.

Typical infection in previous years

I also wanted to reduce the amount of mowing that the approaches required. I applied Primo Maxx on Nov 7th right after they were mowed for the last time in 2014. They currently still don't need a mowing although it would sure help to clean them up. As there is almost no golfer traffic this time of year I am not that concerned at how tidy the course looks.

A have also applied this same plan to my tees with similar results. The last time the tees were cut was Nov 1 2014 and the iron and primo was applied on Nov 4 2014. There is just now some fusarium starting to appear. Perhaps I stretched the application interval too far. I plan on making another iron and primo app to the tees in the next week as well. Hopefully it's not too late.

The total cost of this program has been about $25 for iron and $25 for the primo on approaches and green surrounds. The price for the tees is relatively the same. Not bad considering a fungicide application would easily cost 10x this.

Despite the cool wet weather I have never seen so little fusarium on my tees and approaches at this time of year. I hope that it is a result of the iron and Primo applications. Time will tell.

As for my greens......They aren't that bad but it has been a constant battle this winter. Maybe I should try some iron on them too? I need to bring back the good old check plot to get a better idea of what is really happening out there.

Turfgrass speedo is still my most important tool for managing turf growth after 4 years.

It wasn't the easiest year for growing grass , but the conditions were still pretty good. Almost 4 years ago exactly, I came up with the idea of comparing actual clipping yields to the "ideal" clipping yield or the clipping yield adjusted using the Growth Potential Model . Since then, it has proved to be a much more useful tool to manage growth than I originally thought . It has been almost a decade since I started making observations on plant health and playability and how it relates to the clipping yield. I have been constantly searching for ways to get the growth rate right as often as I can and this tool seems to be the best way I have seen so far, and might ultimately, be the best way going forward. To prove this point I will discuss in a future post, the success I've had with pest control in the past few years (for the most part (Not withstanding the times where I think my greens are dead but they actually aren't...thanks T)). Never needed less There are

Do you have enough?

I recently discussed how we can use fertilizer ratios to simplify how much fertilizer we apply to help us keep above the MLSN guidelines . When we get a soil test done it is a static amount of nutrients found in the soil. Even if you are above the MLSN guidelines at the time of testing, it doesn't guarantee that you will remain at or above the guidelines as the grass grows and consumes nutrients. There is math that you can use to determine exactly how much nutrient you need to apply to ensure that you remain at or above the MLSN guidelines. For many, this is much too complicated. For that reason I made a quick cheat sheet to help you determine how much of each nutrient you can expect to use each year based off a few different annual nitrogen rates. Nutrient use is based primarily on nitrogen use so the left 2 columns are a few different nitrogen rates. The columns for each nutrient are in PPM and are designed to help you look at your current soil test PPM (mehlich 3) and determin

How to quantify nutrient content in liquid fertilizer

In a recent post, I discussed how it was actually cheaper to spray soluble vs granular fertilizer. What about if we use pre-mixed liquid fertilizer? How do we even figure out how much nutrient we are applying with pre-mixed liquid fertilizer? Before I learned that you could simply dissolve soluble fertilizer in water and apply it in a sprayer, I was a big user of pre-mixed liquid fertilizers. One of the issues I initially had was figuring out exactly how much of each nutrient I was applying. The math wasn't as straightforward is it was with granular fertilizers. It turns out, it's actually not that difficult but requires an extra step. First, we need to convert the liquid volume into a mass. Many products will have the product density displayed on the label or you can look in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for that information as well. No SDS? Should you be using products without an SDS? Even if this information isn't included on the label it is very easy to figure out. All

Fusariummy

Search This Blog