Skip to main content

Feb 2012 0.2L/100m2 Zerotol Evaluation

I first learned about the use of Zerotol (H2O2)(certified organic pesticide) at the 2011 Canadian Turfgrass Conference in Vancouver BC. Apparently it was registered for the control of Fusarium Patch (Michrodicium nivale) which is a major turgrass pest on the West Coast of Canada.  This fungus is active almost every month of the year in coastal British Columbia so I was eager to try it out.

My first application was on May 24 2011 at 0.1L/100m2 (low end of label rate).  I reapplied again on the 30th of May at the same rate.  A week later I had to apply some propiconazole as the Zerotol had no effect on the Fusarium.  I had all but given up on the product.

During this past Western Canada Turfgrass Association Conference 2012 I was talking with a fellow Superintendent and he was saying that he had success using Zerotol at the High end of the label rate or 0.2L/100m2 in the Winter only.  My interest was re-ignited.

So last week I jumped the gun a bit and cut my greens when I probably shouldn't have.  Only 3 greens were thawed enough to cut but apparently not thawed enough.  A week later these three greens were covered in Fusarium Patch.  I learned my lesson and will always check my soil temps before I cut in the winter.

The good thing about this disease outbreak is that it gives me an opportunity to test out the higher label rate of Zerotol on 3 of my greens in the winter time.  If it doesn't work I will spray some Iprodione, no big deal.

So I decided to to a bit of a trial to see what the actual effects of the Zerotol were on my Poa annua greens.

I have a few worries using this product as the Hydrogen Peroxide is non selective so it will oxidise beneficial organisms just as easy and the harmful organisms and theoretically giving the harmful organisms a head start in the re-infection process.  I am no John Kaminski so this could all be a "load of balls."

So my trial consists of taking samples of the three greens that were going to be sprayed.  I took 2 samples from each green before the spray and after the spray.  One of these samples was of an active Fusarium Patch and the other was from a relatively healthy part of the putting surface.  The idea behind this is that if the Zerotol harms the beneficial organisms and proves the above theory correct I should see more disease on the sprayed healthy plugs.....or something. I have placed the plugs in my warm office (21C) to speed up the infection process.  I have also taken picture of the green sites where the plugs where harvested to see how the results differ in the field.  This is important as the Superintendent who I was talking with said that the cooler temperatures were what he thought was the deciding factor in making Zerotol effective in the Winter.
Hole 1Control Day 1
Hole 1  Zerotol Day 1


Hole 9 Zerotol Day 1
Hole 9 Control Day 1




Practice Green Zerotol Day 1
Practice Green Control Day 1







The main purpose of this experiment is to generate interest in the product and hopefully more research will be done at the university level so that we as turf managers can learn about how to best use this product.

I will start another post to compare the samples day to day so stay tuned.




Popular posts from this blog

Turfgrass speedo is still my most important tool for managing turf growth after 4 years.

It wasn't the easiest year for growing grass , but the conditions were still pretty good. Almost 4 years ago exactly, I came up with the idea of comparing actual clipping yields to the "ideal" clipping yield or the clipping yield adjusted using the Growth Potential Model . Since then, it has proved to be a much more useful tool to manage growth than I originally thought .  It has been almost a decade since I started making observations on plant health and playability and how it relates to the clipping yield. I have been constantly searching for ways to get the growth rate right as often as I can and this tool seems to be the best way I have seen so far, and might ultimately, be the best way going forward. To prove this point I will discuss in a future post, the success I've had with pest control in the past few years (for the most part (Not withstanding the times where I think my greens are dead but they actually aren't...thanks T)). Never needed less There are

Do you have enough?

I recently discussed how we can use fertilizer ratios to simplify how much fertilizer we apply to help us keep above the MLSN guidelines . When we get a soil test done it is a static amount of nutrients found in the soil. Even if you are above the MLSN guidelines at the time of testing, it doesn't guarantee that you will remain at or above the guidelines as the grass grows and consumes nutrients. There is math that you can use to determine exactly how much nutrient you need to apply to ensure that you remain at or above the MLSN guidelines. For many, this is much too complicated. For that reason I made a quick cheat sheet to help you determine how much of each nutrient you can expect to use each year based off a few different annual nitrogen rates. Nutrient use is based primarily on nitrogen use so the left 2 columns are a few different nitrogen rates. The columns for each nutrient are in PPM and are designed to help you look at your current soil test PPM (mehlich 3) and determin

How to quantify nutrient content in liquid fertilizer

In a recent post, I discussed how it was actually cheaper to spray soluble vs granular fertilizer. What about if we use pre-mixed liquid fertilizer? How do we even figure out how much nutrient we are applying with pre-mixed liquid fertilizer?  Before I learned that you could simply dissolve soluble fertilizer in water and apply it in a sprayer, I was a big user of pre-mixed liquid fertilizers. One of the issues I initially had was figuring out exactly how much of each nutrient I was applying. The math wasn't as straightforward is it was with granular fertilizers. It turns out, it's actually not that difficult but requires an extra step.  First, we need to convert the liquid volume into a mass. Many products will have the product density displayed on the label or you can look in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for that information as well. No SDS? Should you be using products without an SDS? Even if this information isn't included on the label it is very easy to figure out. All