Skip to main content

Take the Guesswork out of Mowing Frequency

Lately there has been a lot of talk about sustainability in golf and reducing our reliance on chemicals.  For the most part if we can reduce or manage the stresses that are affecting our turf we can manage the turf pests that have the potential to kill the turf.

How often do we need to cut our greens in the winter?
One of the most common stresses that we as turf managers force upon our putting greens is intensive mowing. Many superintendents mow their greens once or twice a day in the summertime to keep the putting greens consistent and smooth.  In the summer this is often sustainable as the turf is growing and usually quite healthy.  In the shoulder seasons as well as winter we often have to reduce our mowing frequency to match the changing growth rates of the turf.  We have to take special care not to cut the turf too often or not enough. Cutting too much causes extra stress and cutting not enough will increase the chance of scalping unless the heights of cut are raised.

Most turf managers judge how often they cut in this uncertain growth period simply by looking at the turf.  This is a great way of judging if the turf need to be cut and has been the principle method of mowing since the mower was invented.

On higher cut turf such as our tees, fairways, and rough it is quite obvious when the turf needs to be cut but on our closely cut putting greens the need for cutting isn't always as clear.  Most superintendents manage their putting greens much more intensely than the other areas of the golf course as they are often the selling feature of the golf course.  The putting greens are usually also the most susceptible to turf disease and pests as they are put in an almost constant state of stress. 

Newly planted Poa annua (foreground) had no seed head
due to not being mowed in months.
This all became very clear to me this past summer when I made the observation that the turf on our nursery that was transplanted from cores from our Poa annua putting green aeration did not go to seed.  More about this can be read here.  After consulting with a number of my peers in the turf industry we determined that the turf didn't go to seed was because it was allowed to grow without the stress of mowing. Other studies out there have also shown that with less frequent mowing there is a significant increase in turf quality as well as a reduction in turf disease.

This got me thinking how I could minimize my mowing frequency especially during the shoulder season and winter when I have little control over the environmental conditions stressing the turf while maintaining a consistent height of cut. I came up with a rather crude method of measuring the rate at which the turf was growing which would in turn allow me to predict when the next mowing was needed.

Equipment Use form
Every time a piece of machinery is used on the golf course I have the operator fill out a Google form on my maintenance website with information about what was done and the machine hours.  This is fed into a spreadsheet and is sorted to make sense. You can read more about this here.  I added a entry to the form asking them how many times they filled the baskets on the mower.  With this information along with how long it has been since the last cut I was able to come up with a constant figure (basket fills/day).  This number will allow me to judge when the turf needs to be cut next.  I also have a target value of at least one basket fill per cut.  I don't want to send the mower out if I will get less than one basket of grass as in my experience at Pender Harbour this causes needless stress and will not significantly improve the playing conditions on the greens.

This might seem like a lot of work but it is a simple as inputting one extra piece of information each day.  The spreadsheet does the rest.

In the summer time I cut as often as I can to maintain the desired conditions on the putting greens.  At the Pender Harbour Golf Club we only need to cut every second day and roll daily to achieve consistent fast-rolling greens.  For this club this is the most economical means of achieving these conditions.

In the winter when the turf is growing much slower I can use the growth data that I have collected to predict when the turf next needs mowing.  Not only does this allow me to reduce the stress of mowing on the greens but it also allows me to maximize my labour and mower efficiencies.  I know that I am only cutting when absolutely necessary. 

Now you're probably thinking that this in crazy and totally leaves out the "art" in greenkeeping and you are totally right.  This not an absolute tool for me but more of a guide.  I allows me to better judge when my putting greens need cutting.  The last thing I want is to send the mower out on the course only to find out after that almost no grass was cut or that the greens were so long that they were scalped.  Either of these previous scenarios causes me concern as I just caused my putting greens stress that wasn't needed or justified.  This in turn potentially will increase my chemical use which isn't ideal. 

This tool also allows me to keep my cutting heights low and consistent year-round without the worry of causing my turf excess stress. There is debate in the industry that the height of cut has less to do with turf stress than frequency of cut and I totally agree.  If you can maintain your turf in a consistent manner you can maintain good healthy sustainable turf no matter the height of cut.  This tool helps me do that.

In a time when efficiency and sustainability are paramount it is imperative that we as turf managers do whatever we can to reduce waste and more closely manage the stresses that we subject to our turf. We can no longer base our decisions on a hunch or guess. We need to make informed educated decisions based on the facts. 

For most people this is all you will want to read.  The following is for the nerdiest of the turf nerds.

My spreadsheet for this growth data is complex and is tied into my entire operations so it isn't realistic to tell you how I did this but here is a look at my growth sheet that I use to see my growth rates.

This data if filtered out of my equipment use database to show only the data inputs that show clipping collection on my putting greens with my greens mower.  The spreadsheet then calculates how long it has been since the last cutting in days and then computes the growth rate in empties/day or fills/day (they are the same).  Then by using my optimum empties (or fills) per cut I can calculate the recommended cutting frequency in days. This then spits out the next recommended day that I should cut on. The recommended cutting frequency is made from a rather complex formula that uses past data to generate a trend to make the prediction.  This makes it easier to adjust to fluctuation in the growth rate.  It is basically just the growth rate divided by the optimum empties per cut figure.

The above picture shows the most recent data that I have collected.  I was measuring the clipping yields long before I made this spreadsheet so you can clearly see that I have been cutting my greens more often than I needed to.  If I would have had this spreadsheet up and running earlier I could have eliminated at least 2 cuttings on my putting greens or about 30% of my total times cut since I began recording the data. Over time this will mean significant savings in labour as well as a reduction in the stress on the turf.

I also have the spreadsheet to generate a nifty chart that graphs the growth rate versus time.  This will really be useful in the long run for almost everything we do on the course. This graph will illustrate growth trends we are seeing and be another tool that I can use to better manage my mowing, fertility, and other cultural practices to maximize efficiency and reduce stress on the turf.

Now if you'll excuse me, according to the spreadsheet I need to cut my greens today! hahaha.

Popular posts from this blog

Turfgrass speedo is still my most important tool for managing turf growth after 4 years.

It wasn't the easiest year for growing grass , but the conditions were still pretty good. Almost 4 years ago exactly, I came up with the idea of comparing actual clipping yields to the "ideal" clipping yield or the clipping yield adjusted using the Growth Potential Model . Since then, it has proved to be a much more useful tool to manage growth than I originally thought .  It has been almost a decade since I started making observations on plant health and playability and how it relates to the clipping yield. I have been constantly searching for ways to get the growth rate right as often as I can and this tool seems to be the best way I have seen so far, and might ultimately, be the best way going forward. To prove this point I will discuss in a future post, the success I've had with pest control in the past few years (for the most part (Not withstanding the times where I think my greens are dead but they actually aren't...thanks T)). Never needed less There are

Do you have enough?

I recently discussed how we can use fertilizer ratios to simplify how much fertilizer we apply to help us keep above the MLSN guidelines . When we get a soil test done it is a static amount of nutrients found in the soil. Even if you are above the MLSN guidelines at the time of testing, it doesn't guarantee that you will remain at or above the guidelines as the grass grows and consumes nutrients. There is math that you can use to determine exactly how much nutrient you need to apply to ensure that you remain at or above the MLSN guidelines. For many, this is much too complicated. For that reason I made a quick cheat sheet to help you determine how much of each nutrient you can expect to use each year based off a few different annual nitrogen rates. Nutrient use is based primarily on nitrogen use so the left 2 columns are a few different nitrogen rates. The columns for each nutrient are in PPM and are designed to help you look at your current soil test PPM (mehlich 3) and determin

How to quantify nutrient content in liquid fertilizer

In a recent post, I discussed how it was actually cheaper to spray soluble vs granular fertilizer. What about if we use pre-mixed liquid fertilizer? How do we even figure out how much nutrient we are applying with pre-mixed liquid fertilizer?  Before I learned that you could simply dissolve soluble fertilizer in water and apply it in a sprayer, I was a big user of pre-mixed liquid fertilizers. One of the issues I initially had was figuring out exactly how much of each nutrient I was applying. The math wasn't as straightforward is it was with granular fertilizers. It turns out, it's actually not that difficult but requires an extra step.  First, we need to convert the liquid volume into a mass. Many products will have the product density displayed on the label or you can look in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for that information as well. No SDS? Should you be using products without an SDS? Even if this information isn't included on the label it is very easy to figure out. All